ReviewCureus2025
Comparison of Management Strategies and Associated Complications With Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the rising incidence of slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE), a thorough understanding of its complications and management is crucial. SCFE primarily affects adolescents between the ages of 10 and 16, targeting the epiphysis of the hip. Notably, the condition is most prevalent among overweight individuals and males. Various surgical interventions, such as in situ pinning and open reduction, are available to treat SCFE. Postoperative complications have had multifactorial implications; however, from this study, the modified Dunn procedure appears to have better outcomes pertaining specifically to fewer reoperations and requiring total hip arthroplasty from osteoarthritis. This study compares and contrasts different fixation methods by analyzing outcomes from published studies. Through this literature review, we evaluate each procedure's advantages and disadvantages to recommend the best action for this condition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.