ArticleCureus2025
Effectiveness of Game-Based Learning Versus Problem-Based Learning Approaches in Teaching Microbiology to Phase II Medical Students.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bingo Lab: game-based learning in microbiology.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Enhancing Biochemistry Education for Medical Students Through Game-Based Learning: Students' Perception and Performance.Biochemistry and molecular biology education : a bimonthly publication of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular BiologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThe study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of game-based learning (GBL) and problem-based learning (PBL) modules in teaching basic microbiology topics, examining their impact on student performance, retention, and overall student perception, while also identifying potential limitations to provide insights for future educational approaches in medical education. METHODOLOGY: Two student groups participated in learning activities structured around four microbiology topics using GBL and PBL methodologies. Students' responses to these methods were collected, compared, and analyzed. Feedback was gathered to evaluate student perception and satisfaction. Additionally, a retention test was administered two weeks later to assess the durability of the knowledge acquired.
resultsBoth GBL and PBL methodologies effectively improved student performance in microbiology, as indicated by mean scores, score ranges, and highest scores. However, statistical analysis showed no significant difference between the two methods, suggesting that GBL and PBL were equally effective. Student feedback indicated higher satisfaction and better overall perception of GBL than PBL, specifically in aspects such as understanding concepts, clearing doubts, and improving performance. Frequent application of these methods across various topics may further enhance student learning capabilities.
conclusionIncorporating GBL and PBL into medical curricula significantly enhances learning outcomes, promotes positive student perceptions, and fosters self-directed lifelong learning among undergraduate medical students. These innovative teaching methodologies could be beneficially integrated into medical education to enhance student engagement and educational effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.