Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41111765›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Psychological Safety and Burnout in Nurses: A Scoping Review.

Tomoo Sato, Kyosuke Kakuda, Eri Sekiguchi, Mitsuko Ishiseki, Mutsumi Iwanami, Yukie Akamatsu, Shunsuke Taito

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tomoo SatoDivision of Acute Care Nursing, Kobe City College of Nursing, Kobe, JPN.
Kyosuke KakudaDivision of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, Kobe City College of Nursing, Kobe, JPN.
Eri SekiguchiDivision of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, Kobe City College of Nursing, Kobe, JPN.
Mitsuko IshisekiDivision of Acute Care Nursing, Kobe City College of Nursing, Kobe, JPN.
Mutsumi IwanamiDivision of Child Health Care Nursing, Kobe City College of Nursing, Kobe, JPN.
Yukie AkamatsuDivision of Nursing Theory and Practice, Kobe City College of Nursing, Kobe, JPN.
Shunsuke TaitoDivision of Rehabilitation, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, JPN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Burnout among nurses has become a global problem, with prevalence rates exceeding 40% in high-intensity clinical settings. Psychological safety represents a shared belief about team interpersonal risk-taking safety. These constructs have emerged as potential protective factors in recent research. However, studies that simultaneously examine both constructs remain limited, thereby hindering the development of evidence-based interventions aimed at promoting psychological safety and preventing burnout.Therefore, we conducted a scoping review to evaluate and synthesize existing literature that investigates the direct relationship between psychological safety and burnout among nurses, with emphasis on the conceptualization, measurement, and contextual association of these constructs within the nursing profession. This scoping review was conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and complied with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Excerpta Medica Database, International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and ClinicalTrials.gov. The search was conducted using terms related to psychological safety, burnout, and nurses. Studies were deemed eligible if they involved nurses employed in hospital-based settings and simultaneously examined the concepts of psychological safety and burnout. All published studies that examined psychological safety and burnout among nurses were included, with data extracted on study design, setting, country of origin, publication year, definitions used, measurement instruments, reported scores, and associated factors. Of 1,021 initially identified studies, six met the inclusion criteria, comprising 4,984 nurses across the United States, China, Pakistan, Japan, and South Korea, published between 2021 and 2025. Study designs included four cross-sectional studies, one longitudinal study, and one non-randomized controlled trial, conducted across diverse healthcare settings, including coronavirus disease 2019 wards, emergency departments, and psychiatric units. Three studies reported a consistent inverse relationship between psychological safety and burnout. Psychological safety was consistently defined in accordance with Edmondson's framework, while burnout was assessed based on Maslach's three-dimensional conceptualization. Leadership style, particularly servant leadership, emerged as a key factor potentially influencing both constructs. Workplace conditions, including patient acuity, exposure to workplace violence, and team dynamics, were identified as significant contextual factors.This review provides evidence of a consistent inverse relationship between psychological safety and burnout among nurses, with Edmondson's and Maslach's frameworks offering appropriate conceptual foundations for future research. These findings suggest that promoting psychological safety serves as a protective organizational strategy in high-intensity clinical settings. They also underscore the need for comprehensive, multi-level interventions focused on leadership development, structured communication protocols, and robust organizational support systems to enhance psychological safety and mitigate the risk of burnout.

Indexed as

psychological safetyscoping reviewstaff burnoutstaff nurseworkplace environment

Identifiers

PMID41111765
PMCPMC12532445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.