Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41111732›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Introducing a Standardized Clinical Investigation Sheet for Medical Documentation at Dongola Specialized Hospital, Sudan: A Quality Improvement Project.

Abubakr Muhammed, Mohaned Altijani Abdalgadir Hamdnaalla, Fakher Aldeen Raft Fakher Aldeen Noman, Mohammed Ali Mohammed Ali, Mohey Aldien Ahmed Elamin Elnour, Awad Elkarim Adil Awad Elkarim Mohamed, Suzan Mohammed Eltayeb Eltahir, Rawa Mohamed Idris Mohamed, Ahmed Shakir Ali Yousif, Bashaier Idris Mohamed Abdelrahman and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Abubakr MuhammedSurgery, University of Gezira, Madani, SDN.
Mohaned Altijani Abdalgadir HamdnaallaInternal Medicine, Dongola Specialized Hospital, Dongola, SDN.
Fakher Aldeen Raft Fakher Aldeen NomanInternal Medicine, Dongola Specialized Hospital, Dongola, SDN.
Mohammed Ali Mohammed AliInternal Medicine, Dongola Specialized Hospital, Dongola, SDN.
Mohey Aldien Ahmed Elamin ElnourNeurosurgery, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, GBR.
Awad Elkarim Adil Awad Elkarim MohamedInternal Medicine, Dongola Specialized Hospital, Dongola, SDN.
Suzan Mohammed Eltayeb EltahirInternal Medicine, Sudan Medical Specialization Board, Khartoum, SDN.
Rawa Mohamed Idris MohamedPaediatrics, Dongola Specialized Hospital, Dongola, SDN.
Ahmed Shakir Ali YousifUrology, Dongola Specialized Hospital, Dongola, SDN.
Bashaier Idris Mohamed AbdelrahmanInternal Medicine, Dongola Specialized Hospital, Dongola, SDN.
Maysara ElsiddigGeneral Surgery, Burjeel Medical City, Abu Dhabi, ARE.
Ibrahim Adil Hamadelniel AlhadiGeneral Surgery, Dongola Specialized Hospital, Dongola, SDN.
Thoiba Mohammed Hamdnaallah MohammedPediatric Medicine, Sudan Medical Specialization Board, Madani, SDN.
Heif Aljenan Mohammed Ahmed Yousif MohammedUrology, University Hospitals of Morecambe Bay, Royal Lancaster Infirmary, Lancaster, GBR.
Thwiaba Abdelgadir Yousif MustafaInternal Medicine, Dongola Specialized Hospital, Dongola, SDN.
Mohammed Osman Ahmed OsmanInternal Medicine, National Ribat University, Khartoum, SDN.
Fatima Awad Khalil MohammedInternal Medicine, Dongola Specialized Hospital, Dongola, SDN.
Areej Osman Adam OsmanGeneral Practice, Dongola Specialized Hospital, Dongola, SDN.
Musaab Ahmed Ali FadulGeneral Surgery, Dongola Specialized Hospital, Dongola, SDN.
Abdullah MohamedGeneral Surgery, Dongola Specialized Hospital, Dongola, SDN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inconsistent and incomplete documentation of investigation results at Dongola Specialized Hospital in Sudan has compromised patient safety and clinical efficiency. To address this, a two-cycle quality improvement project was conducted between April and May 2025, with targeted interventions implemented between the cycles to enhance compliance and address identified gaps. In the first cycle, root causes such as the absence of standardized forms, inadequate staff training, and a lack of accountability mechanisms were identified. Interventions included the introduction of a standardized investigation sheet, targeted staff education, and reinforcement strategies such as instructional posters and laminated samples. In the second cycle, redesigned forms with mandatory fields and visual cues were implemented, resulting in substantial improvements in documentation. Patient identification improved from 1.9% to 76.9%, critical markers such as blood group, hepatitis, and HIV status were consistently recorded (100%), and overall documentation completeness rose from 18.2% to 74.0%. However, persistent gaps remained in time-sensitive investigations such as arterial blood gases and glucose levels. These findings demonstrate that standardized documentation tools, supported by training and accountability, can significantly strengthen medical record quality and, by extension, enhance patient safety and clinical decision-making in resource-limited settings. Sustained monitoring, targeted refinements, and potential integration with electronic health records are recommended to maintain progress and scale improvements across similar contexts.

Indexed as

clinical audit cycleshealthcare compliance ratesmedical documentation gapspatient safety interventionsquality improvement projectresource-limited settingsstandardized investigation sheetstructured documentation toolssudan healthcare improvement

Identifiers

PMID41111732
PMCPMC12531884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.