ArticleCureus2025
Patient Satisfaction With Language-Concordant Provider Encounters: A Community-Based Cross-Sectional Survey of Spanish-Speaking Adults.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patient-Provider Communication and Treatment Decision-Making among Latino Men with Prostate Cancer: A Qualitative Study.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2026Article
- Health Education Modalities and Influencing Factors in Rural Philippine Communities: A Mixed-Methods Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHispanic communities in the United States face high rates of chronic disease yet continue to encounter barriers to linguistically concordant care, particularly in underserved regions such as San Bernardino County, California. While professional interpreters improve access, direct provider-patient communication in the patient's preferred language may yield greater trust, comfort, and satisfaction.
objectiveTo assess Spanish-speaking patients' perceptions of clinical encounters conducted directly in Spanish by their healthcare providers and to compare these experiences to prior interpreter-mediated visits.
methodsA cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted among Spanish-speaking adults in San Bernardino County who had recently received language-concordant care and had prior experience with interpreter services. Participants were recruited from community centers in Redlands, Colton, and Rialto. A 5-item Likert-scale survey (1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree) assessed comfort, understanding, emotional support (concerns addressed), trust, and overall satisfaction. Descriptive statistics were calculated.
resultsFifty participants completed the survey. Mean (standard deviation, or SD) agreement scores for statements comparing encounters with Spanish-speaking providers to participants' prior interpreter-mediated visits were comfort with provider, 4.68 (0.51); understanding of medical information, 4.64 (0.48); feeling that concerns were addressed (emotional support), 4.50 (0.61); trust in provider, 4.64 (0.56); and overall satisfaction, 4.62 (0.57). Responses clustered at the upper end of the 5-point scale (agree/strongly agree). Comfort had the highest mean score, and the relatively small SDs indicate limited dispersion and consistency across respondents.
conclusionsLanguage-concordant care with Spanish-speaking providers was associated with consistently high patient satisfaction across relational and communication domains. These findings support expanding access to bilingual providers and integrating medical Spanish training into healthcare education as strategies to improve trust, comprehension, and engagement in Hispanic communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.