ReviewCureus2025
Impact of Standardized Patient Programs on Pre-clinical Medical Students' Clinical Readiness: A Narrative Review of the Last Two Decades.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Standardized patients are a valuable educational tool for students, residents, and even professionals in the healthcare domain. Although their role in improving quality of care, clinical skills, and confidence is well determined for senior students or residents during their formation years, when it comes to pre-clinical year students, simulated patient encounters have a less well-determined role and curriculum integration. With regard to medical education, pre-clinical years are traditionally marked by core knowledge and theoretical lectures conventionally taught in lecture halls, with minimal or no patient contact, given the focus in this vital period of medical formation on gathering information and learning basic science topics. Given the fact that many universities have introduced simulated patient encounters for students in their early medical years, the purpose of this article is to review and describe such experiences published and found in medical databases to fully grasp the benefits, the limitations, and the future directions of such simulated educational activities for young students. Although medical knowledge is scarce and clinical skills are yet to be formed, literature articles exhibit how important social and psychological aspects of doctor-patient encounters can be addressed and rehearsed early on, in controlled, simulated environments that permit exercising verbal and non-verbal communication, appropriate posture, and attitude towards patients in an immersive setting, hopefully improving overall quality of care. In conclusion, the studies described successful models for implementing such simulated activities in the medical curriculum, with positive outcomes and feedback from participating students and educators.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.