Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41111675›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Non-surgical Retrieval of Separated Endodontic Files Using Ultrasonics and Braiding Technique: A Case Series.

Shikha Jaiswal, Sachin Gupta, Anshika Saxena, Shivali Tyagi, Garima Verma

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shikha JaiswalDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Subharti Dental College and Hospital, Meerut, IND.
Sachin GuptaDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Subharti Dental College and Hospital, Meerut, IND.
Anshika SaxenaDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Subharti Dental College, Swami Vivekanand Subharti University, Meerut, IND.
Shivali TyagiDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Subharti Dental College and Hospital, Meerut, IND.
Garima VermaDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Subharti Dental College, Swami Vivekanand Subharti University, Meerut, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Managing endodontically treated teeth with canal obstructions, such as separated instruments, posts, metallic points, etc., presents a significant clinical challenge. Instrument separation during root canal therapy can compromise effective cleaning and shaping, potentially affecting the overall treatment outcome. The presence of a fractured instrument often limits access to the apical root canal region, impeding its adequate cleaning and thereby compromising the prognosis of the case. Therefore, retrieval of the separated fragment is essential to optimize clinical success. Among the various techniques available, ultrasonics has proven to be highly effective for removing fractured instruments by enabling precise navigation within complex canal anatomies. This case series details an efficient approach for the successful retrieval of separated instruments from the root canals using a combination of ultrasonic instruments, such as forceps and H-file.

Indexed as

braiding techniquefractured instrumentretreatmentseparated file retrievalultrasonics

Identifiers

PMID41111675
PMCPMC12532447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.