Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41111664›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Clinical Outcomes of High-Dose Follitropin Delta in POSEIDON (Patient-Oriented Strategies Encompassing Individualized Oocyte Number) Group 4: An Exploratory Case Series on Follicular Efficiency and Embryo Development.

Masato Kobanawa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Masato KobanawaGynecology, Kobanawa Clinic, Omitama City, JPN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Patients classified as Patient-Oriented Strategies Encompassing IndividualizeD Oocyte Number (POSEIDON) Group 4 represent a particularly challenging population in assisted reproductive technology (ART), due to advanced age and diminished ovarian reserve. While follitropin delta allows individualized dosing based on body weight and anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels, its standard use in Japan is limited to 12 μg/day. The efficacy of higher off-label doses in this group remains insufficiently studied. Methods This retrospective case series included seven women aged ≥35 years with antral follicle count (AFC) <5 or AMH <1.2 ng/mL, treated at a single clinic between 2022 and 2024. All patients underwent controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) using a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol and received daily follitropin delta at doses of 15 μg. Key outcomes included follicular development, controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) and oocyte pick-up performance, embryological outcomes, and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) incidence. Results The mean age of the participants was 44.0 years, and the mean AMH was 0.70 ng/mL. The average number of oocytes retrieved was 5.71, with all patients achieving follicle-to-oocyte index (FOI) ≥1.00 (mean 1.52). The mean follicular output rate (FORT) was 1.41. Good-quality blastocysts were obtained in five of seven cases (71.4%). None of the patients had OHSS despite relatively high gonadotropin exposure. No patient discontinued treatment, and the stimulation was well tolerated by all. Conclusion High-dose follitropin delta may represent a feasible and safe option for selected POSEIDON Group 4 patients. However, these findings are preliminary and derived from a small case series without a control group. Further prospective studies are required to confirm efficacy and long-term reproductive outcomes.

Indexed as

assisted reproductive technologycontrolled ovarian stimulationfollicle-to-oocyte indexfollitropin deltagonadotropin-releasing hormone (gnrh) antagonistindividualized treatmentmean follicular output ratepoor responders

Identifiers

PMID41111664
PMCPMC12534898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.