Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41111655›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Management of 10 or More Uterine Fibroids by Laparoscopic Myomectomy: A Comprehensive Review.

Shweta More, Kunal Rathod

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shweta MoreObstetrics and Gynaecology, Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, London, GBR.
Kunal RathodObstetrics and Gynaecology, Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, London, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Laparoscopic myomectomy (LM) for 10 or more fibroids combines the fertility-preserving benefits of minimally invasive surgery with the technical challenge of haemostasis and uterine reconstruction. This narrative review draws exclusively on randomized controlled trials (RCTs), systematic reviews, and meta-analyses to outline perioperative bleeding-reduction strategies, advanced surgical techniques, postoperative complications, and reproductive outcomes. This review highlights structured perioperative pathways with the integration of medical pretreatment, standardized intraoperative protocols, and postoperative care bundle with impact on resource utilization as well as overall patient outcomes. Multimodal preoperative optimization of individual patients involving pharmacotherapy, various collaborative intraoperative haemostasis techniques, precise stepwise surgical approach during LM, and vigilant postoperative management to identify as well as manage the postoperative complications improves overall patient safety. This review article focuses on detailed preoperative counselling to match realistic expectations of desirable fertility outcomes. The quality-of-life assessments and patient-reported outcome measures should be integrated into future research to capture the broader impact on reproductive health in these patients.

Indexed as

adhesion barrierfertilityfibroidshaemostasislaparoscopic myomectomy

Identifiers

PMID41111655
PMCPMC12535432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.