ArticleIndian journal of occupational and environmental medicine
Developing a Tool and Psychometric Test for Assessing Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorder Risk Among Agricultural Workers for Primary Care Units (WRMA).
Article in Indian journal of occupational and environmental medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to develop a screening tool to assess work-related musculoskeletal disorder risk during work by agricultural workers for use in primary care units. A sequential mixed-method design was used to develop this tool. Design: A quantitative study was conducted using exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis. Methods: The study's participants were 160 and 240 cultivating agriculturalists, respectively. Findings: The results showed that work-related musculoskeletal disorders risk was composed of 3 factors: hard work, long working hours, and improper work posture. The indicators had a range of communities from 0.566 to. 788 and the three factors accounted for 66.03% of the variance. The factor loading of the 14 items ranged from. 245 to. 744. two of the items were deleted. The remaining 12 items were analyzed using confirmatory factor analysis. The measurement model of the WRMA fitted the empirical data ( Conclusions: Finally, the WRMA's construct validity was affirmed. Further studies should be conducted to test the WRMA's other psychometric properties. This tool can be used to screen agricultural workers for musculoskeletal problems in a primary care unit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.