ReviewEuropean cardiology2025
Adjudication of Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia Treated with Ibrutinib: Deaths in GLOW or Blowing in the Wind?
Review in European cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Current Perspectives in Cardio-oncology: Insights from Global Experts.European cardiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anti-cancer tyrosine kinase inhibitors are less selective than usually believed and may cause cardiovascular off-target effects. Ibrutinib, a first-in-class covalent inhibitor of Bruton tyrosine kinase, is a pillar of treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) and other B-cell malignancies yet is associated with risks of hypertension, AF and, less frequently, heart failure or ventricular tachyarrhythmias, which may lead to sudden death. The GLOW trial of ibrutinib plus the Bcl-2 inhibitor venetoclax as the first-line, fixed-duration treatment of CLL in elderly patients reported a number of cardiac and sudden deaths; these have been cited by many to downplay the otherwise unprecedented efficacy of this treatment. This article demonstrates that deaths in GLOW were mistakenly attributed to ibrutinib and should have been interpreted in the light of a complex composite of patient characteristics and the dynamics of cardiovascular events. Critical analysis of deaths in GLOW should serve as a lesson to improve clinicians' appraisal of the risk:benefit ratio of using one cancer drug or another.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.