ArticleDiabetology international2025
Clinical features and outcomes of hyperglycemic hyperosmolar syndrome: a retrospective study at a Japanese university hospital.
Article in Diabetology international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Hyperglycemic hyperosmolar syndrome (HHS) is a severe complication of diabetes, and is triggered by infection, use of corticosteroids, non-adherence to medications, and acute diseases. Despite advances in diabetes management, the clinical features and outcomes of patients with HHS remain unclear. This study aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics and prognoses of patients with HHS at a university hospital in Japan. Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed 84 consecutive patients diagnosed with HHS between 2018 and 2023. Patients with HHS were classified into "isolated HHS" and "mixed diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA)/HHS" groups based on established criteria. A subgroup analysis further divided the isolated HHS group into those with and without metabolic acidosis. Clinical data were collected from electronic medical records. Results: The median age of patients with HHS was 75 years, with infections (51.2%) being the most common trigger. Approximately 70% of patients did not receive diabetes medication. The isolated HHS group had a significantly higher 30-day mortality rate (26.0%) than the mixed DKA/HHS group (0%). In the isolated HHS group, those with metabolic acidosis showed markedly worse outcomes, with a 30-day mortality rate of 54.6% versus 20.7% in those without acidosis. Conclusion: HHS predominantly affects elderly patients and is often associated with poor diabetes management. The isolated HHS group had a worse prognosis than the mixed DKA/HHS group, and the presence of metabolic acidosis other than ketoacidosis significantly increased mortality. Regular blood glucose monitoring and appropriate diabetes medications are crucial for preventing the development of HHS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.