ArticleDiabetology international2025
Pharmacotherapy in metabolic-dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease: an updated review of the past, present and a promising future.
Article in Diabetology international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mesenchymal stem cells and extracellular vesicles for MAFLD: from biological mechanisms to translational prospects.Stem cell research & therapy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Metabolic-dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) or metabolic-dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) has been recognised as one of the most important aetiologies of chronic liver disease and also a marker of high risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) in patients with or without diabetes. The presence of diabetes accelerates the progression of MASLD. The pathogenesis of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) is complex and the diagnostic procedures to assess histologic endpoints in clinical trials are challenging. This poses significant difficulties in the discovery of newer drugs with meaningful efficacy. A comprehensive literature search using MEDLINE (via PubMed), Scopus and Google Scholar databases was performed to write a narrative evidence-based review on the current status of different pharmacotherapies in MASLD. Despite numerous pharmacotherapies being studied, until recently, there was no approved agent for the treatment of MASH. However, some established and few emerging medications have recently shown promising effects in preventing its progression, as evidenced in preclinical and clinical trials. This narrative review summarises the current status, mechanisms, efficacy and safety of established as well as new and emerging pharmacotherapies for treatment of MASH. It also provides a practical approach to the clinical use of these agents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.