Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41111554›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomolecular techniques : JBT2025

Greater Reliance on Shared Resources Can Enrich the Future Success of Academic Research.

Nicholas P Ambulos, Sheenah M Mische, Jay W Fox

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomolecular techniques : JBT, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Embedding FAIR Data Practices in Shared Core Resource Facilities.Journal of biomolecular techniques : JBT · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nicholas P AmbulosUniversity of Maryland School of Medicine.
Sheenah M MischeNew York University Grossman School of Medicine.
Jay W FoxUniversity of Virginia School of Medicine.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Federal funding for academic research is currently under scrutiny. Significant changes are anticipated, and we are already observing large cuts across all government agencies. Bracing for possible reductions in federal funding, academic institutions are proactively reviewing operations to minimize the impact on institutional research. After 50 years of successfully enhancing academic research, shared research resources (SRRs) are a proven model of providing efficiency and cost-effectiveness. SRRs provide critical data that have led to a significant number of high-impact publications and a considerable increase in funding for investigators. SRRs are positioned to make further improvements to the institutional research ecosystem through targeted investments and proper strategic planning with institutional leadership. Improvements, such as those outlined in this study, can significantly drive academic biomedical research, increasing competitiveness for research funding, which can ease the impact of cuts to current federal funding models.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchFinancing, GovernmentHumansResearch Support as TopicUnited Statesbiomedical researchfederal fundinginstitutional leadershipinstitutional research supportinstrumentationresearch sustainabilityshared research resourcestechnology

Identifiers

PMID41111554
PMCPMC12530729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.