ArticleInternational journal of endocrinology and metabolism2025
Exploring Community Readiness for Childhood Obesity Prevention: A Systematic Review of the Evidence.
Article in International journal of endocrinology and metabolism, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Context: The community readiness (CR) level is a critical factor affecting the success and sustainability of prevention programs. Objectives: This study systematically reviews research utilizing the community readiness model (CRM) to assess CR for childhood obesity prevention programs, identifying readiness levels and summarizing their characteristics and outcomes. Methods: A comprehensive electronic and manual search was performed across multiple databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, PsycINFO, Pub Psych, ERIC, ProQuest, and CINAHL, as well as two key journals: Preventing chronic disease and health education and behavior. The search adhered to predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Studies evaluating CR for obesity prevention in children and adolescents aged 0 to 19 years were included, with no restrictions based on gender, race, ethnicity, or language. Three reviewers conducted data extraction and assessed the risk of bias using two appraisal forms from the Joanna Briggs Institute. Results: A total of 27 studies were included, with 24 conducted in high-income countries. Readiness levels across studies ranged from the first to the fifth stages. Communities generally reached the highest stage in the community effort dimension but were at the lowest stage regarding community climate and knowledge about the issue. The heterogeneity of the studies made it challenging to compare CR levels among different communities. Conclusions: This study provides an overview of CR levels and objectives of CR assessments, highlighting the significance of bottom-up interventions in childhood obesity prevention. It emphasizes the necessity of conducting context-specific readiness assessments before implementing interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.