ArticleJournal of injury & violence research2025
Demographics and injuries in assaults from drive-by shootings seen in US emergency departments 1993-2020.
Article in Journal of injury & violence research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere has been minimal research on drive-by shootings since the 1990s. It was the purpose of this study to investigate the demographics and injury patterns of drive-by shootings across the entire US using a national database.
methodsThe Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research Firearm Injury Surveillance Study 1993-2020 (ICPSR 38574) data for 1993 through 2020 was analyzed using statistical analyses accounting for the stratified and weighted nature of the data.
resultsThere were an estimated 63,882 emergency department visits due to drive-by shootings. The drive-by group was younger compared to the no-drive-by group (average age 24.5 years vs. 28.7 years - p less than 10-4). Patients injured in drive-by shootings were more prevalent in medium and large size hospitals. There was a lower percentage of White (17.9% vs. 42.3%) and a higher percentage of Hispanic (30.1% vs. 13.1%) peoples in the drive-by group compared to the no-drive-by group (p = 0.0009). The head/neck (14.3% vs. 3.5%) and lower extremity (35.5% vs. 25.5%) were more commonly injured in the drive-by group compared to the no-drive by group (p = 0.0008). While those in the drive-by group were admitted to the hospital more often (43.9% vs. 32.7%), there was no difference in the percentage of fatalities between the two groups (4.4% drive-by, 4.9% no-drive-by).
conclusionsThis study encompasses both rural and urban areas, all races, and both sexes. These national estimates give health care providers and health facility administrators important demographic information. While both drive-by and no-drive-by shootings increased from 2014 onward, the average annual increase was much greater for the drive-by group (22.7%) compared to the non-drive-by group (8.6%). This data provides helpful information that could be useful when analyzing prevention strategies and firearm legislation and their impact on drive-by shootings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.