ArticleCancer2025
Disparities in cancer clinical trials among low- and middle-income countries: A 20-year analysis.
Article in Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere are suspected disparities in clinical research (CR) development among low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This study investigated differences in number and complexity of clinical trials (CTs) and how economic growth (EG) might contribute to these disparities.
methodsFor countries classified as LMICs in 2000, number, proportion of phase 1-2/3 and independent/pharma-sponsored CTs were documented. For correlations with EG, correlation coefficients (CC) were produced, indicating very weak, weak, moderate, strong, and very strong correlation.
resultsA total of 16,977 CTs were identified. Asian countries China and South Korea experienced strong EG and increases in CTs (very strong CC). South/Southeast Asian countries had strong EG but modest increases in CTs (variable CC). Most East European countries and West Asian/Southeast European Turkey experienced robust EG and increases in CTs (moderate to strong and very strong CC, respectively). South/North American Argentina, Brazil, and Mexico had inconsistent EG but increases in CTs (weak to moderate CC). Among African countries, Egypt showed strong EG with a corresponding increase in CTs (strong CC), whereas South Africa had a weak CC. Most LMICs, except for China and South Korea, relied heavily on pharma-sponsored CTs, with a persistently low proportion of early-phase (1-2) compared to late-phase (3) CTs.
conclusionCR development has been unequal among LMICs. Strong EG could be a contributing factor but only to some extent. Only China and South Korea meaningfully developed independent and high-complexity CR. These data reinforce the need for initiatives to support cancer research in LMICs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.