Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41111329›Full record

ArticleJournal of injury & violence research2025

A retrospective study of maxillofacial fractures among adult population in Malda, India.

Santanu Mukhopadhyay, Anjan Jana, Nikita Singhal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of injury & violence research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Santanu MukhopadhyayDepartment of Dentistry, Malda Medical College and Hospital Malda West Bengal, India. Email: msantanu25@gmail.com.
Anjan JanaDepartment of Dentistry, Malda Medical College and Hospital Malda West Bengal, India.
Nikita SinghalDepartment of Dentistry, Malda Medical College and Hospital Malda West Bengal, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMaxillofacial injuries are common in emergency departments of hospitals. However, there is limited regional data on facial fracture patterns in rural India. This study examines the etiology and anatomical distribution of facial fractures among adults attending Malda Medical College and Hospital in eastern India.

methodsThis retrospective study included all adult patients (≥18 years) with radiologically confirmed facial fractures from August 2018 to July 2023. Data were collected on demographics, etiology, and fracture location. Patients with isolated soft tissue injuries or dentoalveolar fractures were excluded. Data analysis was performed using Epi Info 7 software.

resultsIn this study, 387 individuals with 557 facial fractures (averaging 1.43 fractures per person) participated. The average age was 37.56 ± 3.80 years, featuring a higher proportion of males (77.8%). Road traffic accidents (RTAs) accounted for 60.5% of the cases, making them the primary factor. Falls came next at 18.6%, followed by violence (12.1%) and sports injuries (8.8%). The most commonly affected areas were the mandible (33.0%), zygomatic complex (28.2%), and nasal bones (11.8%). Mandibular fractures were primarily caused by RTAs in males, while falls were more common among females. The etiology of fractures varies significantly between males and females (p = 0.000).

conclusionsRTAs were the main reason for facial fractures in eastern India, predominantly affecting young males.

Indexed as

Maxillofacial InjuriesSkull FracturesAccidental FallsAccidents, TrafficAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansIndiaMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41111329
PMCPMC13185656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.