ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2025
What is the
Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The notion of the numeral base in linguistics.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025Review
- Making up numbers in Pano languages: idiosyncratic and unconventional base-free quantification inventories in Amazonia.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025Article
- A solid base for scaling up: the structure of numeration systems.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As researchers and as laypeople, we inhabit worlds replete with numerals, numerals structured by a base system. We rely on exponentiation and powers of the base to describe these systems. This research habit, along with our familiar experience of numerals as expressing precision, produces a conceptual blind spot regarding their development, structure and purpose. In examining the protracted historical developments of the decimal base system for non-integers-which (i) emerged hundreds of years after the integer positional system, (ii) relied on tools developed in different domains separate from concerns of precise denotation, and (iii) were adopted owing to contingent computational benefits-we see that this blind spot obscures our understanding of base, exponentiation and the non-integers. The usage of exponentiation in the structure of 'base' and positional systems emerged as a result of this extension rather than through the explication of this structure. Although lingua francas are important in research, we must be sensitive to their history, especially when their structure and purpose in contemporary contexts may differ from their historical and developmental contexts.This article is part of the theme issue 'A solid base for scaling up: the structure of numeration systems'.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.