Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41111258›Full record

ArticleAnatomy & cell biology2025

Prevalence of variants in gonadal vessels: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Ioannis Paschopoulos, George Triantafyllou, Vasileios Ediaroglou, Nikolaos Arkadopoulos, Rǎzvan Costin Tudose, Mugurel Constantin Rusu, George Tsakotos, Juan Jose Valenzuela-Fuenzalida, Maria Piagkou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Anatomy & cell biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ioannis PaschopoulosDepartment of Anatomy, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-6221-7537
George TriantafyllouDepartment of Anatomy, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-0122-2436
Vasileios EdiaroglouDepartment of Anatomy and Surgical Anatomy, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-3839-6779
Nikolaos ArkadopoulosFourth Department of Surgery, Attikon University Hospital, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0355-0417
Rǎzvan Costin TudoseDivision of Anatomy, Department 1, Faculty of Dentistry, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-4655-4574
Mugurel Constantin RusuDivision of Anatomy, Department 1, Faculty of Dentistry, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8723-0540
George TsakotosDepartment of Anatomy, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8559-8969
Juan Jose Valenzuela-FuenzalidaDepartamento de Morfología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Andrés Bello, Santiago, Chile.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7634-012X
Maria PiagkouDepartment of Anatomy, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4831-8005

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gonadal arteries (GAs) and gonadal veins (GVs) display substantial anatomical variation, which has direct implications for surgical procedures, radiological interpretation, and fertility management. This study aimed to systematically review and meta-analyze the prevalence, origin, course, and drainage patterns of gonadal vessels in human anatomy. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted in line with current Evidence-Based Anatomy and PRISMA 2020 guidelines. A comprehensive search of major databases and anatomical journals yielded 31 eligible studies, comprising data on 2,875 gonadal vessels. The typical GA anatomy (single artery arising from the abdominal aorta) was observed in 98.72% of cases. Accessory GAs were found in 1.12%, most commonly arising from the renal artery (5.52%), with rare origins (<0.01%) from the accessory renal or suprarenal arteries. A normal arterial course was present in 90.24%, while an arched course occurred in 9.76%. The typical GV pattern (single vein draining into the inferior vena cava [IVC] or renal vein) was seen in 94.97%, and accessory GVs in 5.03%. The right GV drained into the IVC in 96.51%, with aberrant drainage to the right renal vein in 4.41%. The left GV drained into the left renal vein in 95.35%, with aberrant IVC drainage in 4.17%. Although the typical gonadal vascular anatomy predominates, variants, especially in GA origin and GV drainage, are not rare and must be recognized. These findings underscore the clinical importance of anatomical awareness in surgical planning, radiological evaluation, and the management of urological and reproductive conditions.

Indexed as

Evidence-based anatomyGonadal vesselsOvarianTesticularVariation

Identifiers

PMID41111258
PMCPMC12719107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.