Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41110946›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of physiology2026

Visual modulation of vestibular-evoked balance response disturbed by posterior cortical atrophy.

Dilek Ocal, Brian L Day, Amy Peters, Matt Bancroft, David Cash, Diego Kaski, Natalie S Ryan, Sebastian J Crutch, Keir X X Yong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Dilek OcalDementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0934-1613
Brian L DayDepartment of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK.
Amy PetersDepartment of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK.
Matt BancroftDepartment of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5513-5058
David CashDementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7833-616X
Diego KaskiDepartment of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK.
Natalie S RyanDementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.
Sebastian J CrutchDementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.
Keir X X YongDementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9708-3599

Funding

Alzheimer's Research UK Senior FellowshipAlzheimer's Society 453 (AS-JF-18-003)Alzheimer's Society AS-PG-14-022ESRC/NIHRFP7 Ideas: European Research Council 616905Vivensa Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have recently shown that perception of uprightness is disturbed in typical Alzheimer's disease (tAD) and posterior cortical atrophy (PCA; 'visual-variant Alzheimer's'); disturbances were attributed to disrupted spatial transformation of graviceptive information. Here, we extend investigations to the vestibular control of uprightness during stance using galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) under various proprioceptive and visual conditions. An appropriately directed response to GVS requires spatial transformation of the vestibular signal based on head orientation relative to the feet, while non-vestibular sensory information can modulate the magnitude of response. Balance responses were repeatedly evoked in healthy participants (n = 21) and participants with AD (tAD: n = 18; PCA: n = 18) under conditions evaluating proprioceptive-vestibular integration (head directed right, straight or left without vision), or visuo-vestibular integration (head directed straight with or without vision). Across head directions without vision, GVS-evoked response direction and magnitude were comparable across groups. These comparable responses without vision indicate sparing of vestibulo-motor systems and proprioceptive-vestibular integration predicated on transformations between head, body and leg coordinates. However, the modulating effect of vision on GVS-evoked response magnitude was decreased in PCA relative to control and tAD groups. This relatively decreased effect of vision in PCA was evident through the earliest mechanical indicator of response, consistent with reduced feedforward effects of vision on vestibularly driven balance response. Exaggerated response magnitude with vision was associated with occipito-thalamic volumetric and projection fibre abnormalities in PCA. The findings suggest candidate pathways for visual modulation of vestibular balance control and dissociations between systems responsible for perceiving uprightness versus rapid sensorimotor balance control. KEY POINTS: Accurate balance control relies on the integration of vestibular, proprioceptive and visual inputs, transformed across spatial reference frames. We examined whole-body balance responses to galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) under varying visual and proprioceptive conditions in people with posterior cortical atrophy (PCA), typical Alzheimer's disease (tAD) and controls. Without vision, GVS-evoked balance responses were comparable across groups with the head turned left, right or straight ahead, indicating spared proprioceptive-vestibular integration in patient groups. With vision, visual input had a reduced modulatory effect on GVS responses in PCA relative to tAD and control groups. This was evident at the earliest stage of mechanical response, suggesting reduced feedforward visual influences on balance control in PCA. Our findings implicate disrupted occipito-thalamic pathways in PCA-related balance disturbances. The findings reveal a dissociation between perceived uprightness and sensorimotor balance control, with implications for understanding disturbed spatial orientation and balance in dementia.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseCerebral CortexPostural BalanceVestibule, LabyrinthVisual PerceptionAgedAged, 80 and overAtrophyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProprioceptionAlzheimer's diseasegalvanic vestibular stimulationmultisensory processingposterior cortical atrophypostural controlstanding balance

Identifiers

PMID41110946
PMCPMC12871904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.