Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41110837›Full record

ArticleBone & joint open2025

Unsuspected low-grade infection in revision surgery for nonunion in foot and ankle arthrodesis : incidence, causative microorganisms, and treatment.

Eline M Steggink, Anthranilla E Leeuwesteijn, Denise Telgt, Karin Veerman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bone & joint open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Eline M StegginkSint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Anthranilla E LeeuwesteijnSint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Denise TelgtSint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Karin VeermanSint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: Nonunion after foot and ankle arthrodesis is a major complication, which can lead to revision arthrodesis with increased risk of morbidity. Multiple factors can contribute to developing a nonunion, including a low-grade infection. The aim of this study is to investigate the rate of unsuspected low-grade infection in revision surgery for nonunion after foot and ankle arthrodesis. We also analyzed the difference in outcome of revision arthrodesis for patients with or without infection. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study in the Sint Maartenskliniek, the Netherlands. All patients who underwent a revision arthrodesis (index surgery) for assumed aseptic nonunion after foot and ankle arthrodesis between January 2019 and July 2021 were included. Patients were excluded if fewer than five tissue samples were obtained during index surgery, or if infection was suspected before or during the index surgery. The causative microorganisms, antibiotic susceptibility, treatment, and outcome were assessed. Results: In total, 105 revision arthrodeses due to nonunion were performed, of which 77 patients were included. In 17 patients (22.1%), an infection was diagnosed based on culture results of tissue samples taken during index arthrodesis. The causative bacteria identified were Conclusion: Low-grade infection should be considered as a possible explanation of a nonunion, despite the lack of local inflammatory signs. As 22% of the nonunions were unexpectedly caused by low-grade infection, we strongly recommend obtaining at least five tissue samples for culture during revision arthrodesis. The success rate of revision surgery followed by targeted antibiotics in patients with a low-grade infection is 77%, which is lower than the outcome in revision surgery for patients without infection (88%), although not significant (p = 0.451).

Identifiers

PMID41110837
PMCPMC12535800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.