Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41110832›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering2025

A Computational Multiscale Framework for Bone Remodeling: Coupling Apparent Density Evolution and Microscale Shape Optimization.

Balavignesh Vemparala, Mingshi Ji, Prasath Mageswaran, Gregory G Knapik, Khaled Dibs, Dukagjin M Blakaj, Eric C Bourekas, Ehud Mendel, William S Marras, Soheil Soghrati

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Balavignesh VemparalaDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7093-2362
Mingshi JiDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Prasath MageswaranDepartment of Integrated Systems Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Gregory G KnapikDepartment of Integrated Systems Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Khaled DibsDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Dukagjin M BlakajDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Eric C BourekasDepartment of Neurological Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Ehud MendelDepartment of Neurosurgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
William S MarrasDepartment of Integrated Systems Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Soheil SoghratiDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone remodeling models are typically phenomenological or mechano-biological but often lack mechanisms to incorporate patient-specific data, limiting clinical use. We present a patient-specific multiscale framework that couples finite element (FE)-based shape optimization at the microscale with a mechano-biological model at the macroscale. The model predicts % bone mineral density (BMD) changes at the macroscale, which in turn drive microscale trabecular adaptation via % bone volume fraction (BV/TV) changes. Micro-QCT imaging data are used to train a DCGAN-based ReconGAN for virtual reconstruction of trabecular microstructures, from which FE models are generated. Apparent BMD changes predicted by the macroscale model guide the microscale shape optimization to simulate adaptation. The framework reproduces BMD losses of 9.8% (trabecular) and 4.9% (whole vertebra) over a 215-day spaceflight scenario, consistent with results from prolonged bed rest and controlled experimental datasets. In vertebral compression fracture simulations, it captures trabecular bone degeneration by reducing peak load from 3.532 to 3.280 kN and energy absorption from 0.243 to 0.218 J, and recovery restores close agreement to the original microstructure. These results demonstrate a path toward patient-specific simulation of bone remodeling and its mechanical consequences, with strong potential for treatment planning and assessment of skeletal interventions.

Indexed as

Bone DensityBone RemodelingComputer SimulationFinite Element AnalysisHumansModels, BiologicalX-Ray Microtomographybone remodelingfinite element methodmechanobiologicalradiation therapyvertebral compression fracture

Identifiers

PMID41110832
PMCPMC12535801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.