ArticleHeart rhythm2025
The predictive power of left atrial reservoir strain for long-term atrial fibrillation in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study.
Article in Heart rhythm, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLeft atrial (LA) function measures from the 2-dimensional echocardiograms are linked to atrial fibrillation (AF) development, but their standalone predictive value remains unclear.
objectiveThis study assessed the standalone predictive power of LA function measures for long-term AF prediction (5 and 10 years).
methodsWe analyzed 5442 older adults (median age 74) from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study without previous AF. Participants were split into training and testing sets (7:3 ratio). We evaluated the standalone predictive performance of LA strain measures (reservoir, conduit, and contraction strain) with and without age for long-term AF. The performance was compared with that of the CHARGE-AF score and a machine learning-based predictive model that incorporates the most important routinely measured echocardiographic parameters with LA strain measures.
resultsLA reservoir strain alone achieved a Harrell's C-index of 0.664 and 0.646 for 5- and 10-year AF prediction, improving to 0.677 and 0.663 when combined with age, which outperformed the CHARGE-AF score (0.667 and 0.655) and other LA strain measures. A better predictive performance was achieved by the machine learning-based predictive model, including LA reservoir strain, age, race, and 9 echocardiographic parameters; the C-indexes were 0.732 (0.686-0.777) for 5-year and 0.725 (0.693-0.757) for 10-year prediction.
conclusionThe standalone predictive performance of LA reservoir strain for long-term AF risk is comparable with the CHARGE-AF score (11 variables) and slightly lower than that of a machine learning-based model with 12 variables, highlighting the importance of LA reservoir in AF risk prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.