ArticleSmall (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany)2025
Unraveling the Folding Dynamics of DNA Origami Structures.
Article in Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Science Outreach: Providing an Authentic Independent Research Opportunity in Materials Science to School Students.Journal of chemical education · 2026Article
- DNA Origami and Their Application in Biosensors.Biosensors · 2026Review
- Complex cooperativity in DNA origami revealed via design-dependent defectivity.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Unraveling the Folding Dynamics of DNA Origami Structures.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Achieving high folding yield remains a challenge in DNA origami, particularly as structures increase in complexity and scale. Here, how DNA origami design influences folding is investigated using a combination of real-time fluorometry, gel electrophoresis, electron microscopy, and theoretical analysis. Results reveal a balance of free energy changes from loop formation and hybridization that govern nucleation of nanostructure assembly, while the extent of cooperativity determines the overall assembly. The effect of structural complexity, staple design, and scaffold design on each energetic parameter, folding yield, kinetics, and cooperativity is measured. The results show that the scaffold pattern determines the extent of cooperativity, where fewer scaffold crossovers result in more cooperative folding. These findings use a tool developed in this work to estimate the extent of cooperativity in any structure. It is also found that limiting the number of crossovers per staple should be prioritized over extending staple binding domains, as the entropic penalty dominates the favorable binding. Finally, a 1-2 h focused annealing ramp strategy is demonstrated, that can increase yield up to 17% relative to traditional multi-day ramps. Optimizing energy changes and cooperativity through design can significantly enhance assembly yield and reduce time, particularly for complex structures, aiding large-scale DNA materials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.