Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41110017›Full record

ArticleGastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association2026

Clinical impact of gastrectomy in surgically proven stage IV gastric cancers: retrospective analysis from Korean multicenter dataset (PASS-META).

Ho-Jung Shin, Jeong Ho Song, Sung Eun Kim, In-Seob Lee, Hyoung-Il Kim, Han Hong Lee, Oh Jeong, Mi Ran Jung, Hoon Hur, Palliative Stomach Surgery for Metastasis (PASS-META) Study Group

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ho-Jung Shin *Department of Surgery, Ajou University School of Medicine, 164, Worldcup-ro, Yeongtong-gu, Suwon, 16499, Republic of Korea.
Jeong Ho Song *Department of Surgery, Ajou University School of Medicine, 164, Worldcup-ro, Yeongtong-gu, Suwon, 16499, Republic of Korea.
Sung Eun KimDepartment of Surgery, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, South Korea.
In-Seob LeeDepartment of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Hyoung-Il KimDepartment of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Han Hong LeeDepartment of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea.
Oh JeongDepartment of Surgery, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, South Korea.
Mi Ran JungDepartment of Surgery, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, South Korea.
Hoon HurDepartment of Surgery, Ajou University School of Medicine, 164, Worldcup-ro, Yeongtong-gu, Suwon, 16499, Republic of Korea. hhcmc75@ajou.ac.kr.ORCID 0000-0002-5435-5363
Palliative Stomach Surgery for Metastasis (PASS-META) Study Group

Funding

RS-2023-KH134639 RS-2023-KH134639
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPalliative resection for metastatic gastric cancer is not recommended in current practice guidelines; however, it is frequently performed based on clinical considerations. Prospective trials face challenges, necessitating large-scale retrospective analyses to provide clinical evidence.

methodsThe PASS-META study group established a cohort of 983 patients with gastric cancer with surgically confirmed metastatic lesions treated at five major Korean institutions from 2014 to 2021, collecting 126 variables from preoperative, operative, and postoperative data through hospital records. The correlation between gastrectomy and survival outcomes was investigated using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) and standardization to estimate counterfactual outcomes.

resultsMachine learning-based imputation and statistical causal survival analysis revealed that gastrectomy was found to significantly improve survival in patients with limited peritoneal metastasis (P1 or P2; RR: 0.90, 95% CI 0.85-0.94), as well as in those with distant lymph node metastasis (dLN1; RR: 0.92, 95% CI 0.91-0.94) and hepatic metastasis (H1; RR: 0.92, 95% CI 0.82-1.00), suggesting a potential survival advantage across these subgroups. No survival benefit was observed in patients with severe peritoneal metastasis (P3). Among patients with P1-P2 metastasis, extensive lymph node dissection improved the 5-year survival rates compared with limited dissection, whereas minimally invasive surgery did not affect the survival outcome. Although gastrectomy increased the postoperative hospital stay and delayed the initiation of the first postoperative chemotherapy compared to patients without gastrectomy, it did not affect the total number of chemotherapy cycles.

conclusionThis study suggests that gastrectomy offers a significant survival benefit to patients with surgically proven stage IV gastric cancer and limited peritoneal metastasis (P1/P2), distant lymph node (dLN1), or hepatic metastases (H1). Furthermore, specific surgical procedures such as extended lymph node dissection or minimally invasive surgery may be considered for patients undergoing gastrectomy.

Indexed as

GastrectomyPeritoneal NeoplasmsStomach NeoplasmsAgedFemaleHumansLiver NeoplasmsLymphatic MetastasisMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPrognosisRepublic of KoreaRetrospective StudiesSurvival RateGastric cancerPalliative gastrectomySurvival

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.