ReviewVeterinary surgery : VS2026
Diagnosis and surgical management of septic peritonitis in small animals: A review.
Review in Veterinary surgery : VS, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ultrasound-Guided Thoracic Paravertebral, Erector Spinae Plane and Quadratus Lumborum Blocks During Emergency Laparotomy in Dogs: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.Veterinary sciences · 2026Article
- Mesenteric Abscess Complicated by Septic Peritonitis in a Dog: Multimodal Diagnosis, Surgical Management, and Serial Quantitative Bacterial Load Monitoring.Veterinary sciences · 2026Article
- Diagnosis and surgical management of septic peritonitis in small animals: A review.Veterinary surgery : VS · 2026Review
- Perioperative management of septic peritonitis in small animals: A review.Veterinary surgery : VS · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSeptic peritonitis (SP) is a complex disease with significant morbidity and mortality. Diagnosis can be challenging, and lack of a timely diagnosis may impact survival.
aimThe aim of this review was to synthesize current knowledge on the diagnosis and surgical management of SP in dogs and cats.
conclusionsRecent studies suggest refinements of previously reported clinicopathologic criteria improve diagnostic and prognostic accuracy. When evaluating blood-effusion glucose differences, clinicians should be aware of the confounding effects of point of care glucometers. Cytology specimens should be prepared immediately to avoid sample degradation. Advances in imaging have improved the relevance and diagnostic value of ultrasound and computed tomography. Surgical source control that targets the underlying cause is crucial. Accurate assessment of tissue viability may be aided by technologies under development. Anastomotic dehiscence may be reduced by using stapling devices and reinforcement with endogenous or exogenous materials. Evidence for the effectiveness of postoperative drainage via open abdomen ± vacuum-assisted closure, or closed suction drains, is unclear. Heterogeneity of patient severity and incomplete data limit direct comparisons between studies and highlight opportunities for future investigation. IMPLICATIONS: Developments in diagnostic and surgical techniques may improve prognostication and outcomes in septic patients. There are many opportunities for further research into diagnosis and surgical treatment of patients with septic peritonitis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.