Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41109935›Full record

ArticleAnatomical science international2025

Double ascending pharyngeal artery: the first evidence.

Rodica Narcisa Calotă, Răzvan Costin Tudose, Mugurel Constantin Rusu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Anatomical science international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rodica Narcisa CalotăDivision of Anatomy, Faculty of Dentistry, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021, Bucharest, Romania.
Răzvan Costin TudoseDivision of Anatomy, Faculty of Dentistry, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021, Bucharest, Romania. razvan-costin.tudose0721@stud.umfcd.ro.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-4655-4574
Mugurel Constantin RusuDivision of Anatomy, Faculty of Dentistry, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021, Bucharest, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most studies of the ascending pharyngeal artery (APA) observed its different possibilities of origin. No evidence had been previously presented of either double or partly duplicated APAs. The anatomic variants reported here were found during the retrospective review of archived angioCT imaging data from two adult males, both aged 65 years. In the first case, a double APA was found on the right side. The inferior APA and a linguofacial trunk had infrahyoid origins from the external carotid artery (ECA) and coursed over the greater horn of the hyoid. The superior APA had a suprahyoid origin from the ECA. On the left side, the APA, lingual, and facial arteries had infrahyoid origins and ascended on the inner side of the greater hyoid horn. In Case #2, there were two roots of the left APA, leaving the ECA above the greater hyoid horn. An anastomotic branch united the APA and the ascending palatine artery. A superiorly looped long sternocleidomastoid branch left the ECA proximally to the origin of the lingual artery. We brought here the first convincing evidence of double and, respectively, two-rooted (partly duplicated) APAs. These possibilities warrant caution during open-field surgeries. Care should be taken to the arteries expected to originate from the ECA at a distance from the greater hyoid horn because they can have infrahyoid origins and may course over or under this surgical landmark.

Indexed as

Anatomical variationExternal carotid arteryHyoid boneParapharyngeal space

Identifiers

PMID41109935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.