Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41109924›Full record

ReviewProstate cancer and prostatic diseases2026

Neuroscience in prostate cancer.

Ziteng Liu, Qiang Peng, Yuliang Wang, Peter Ka-Fung Chiu, Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh, Rongjiang Wang, Xiaodong Liu, Dinglan Wu, Chi-Fai Ng

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ziteng LiuSH Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Qiang PengSH Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Yuliang WangSH Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Peter Ka-Fung ChiuSH Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1499-8372
Jeremy Yuen-Chun TeohSH Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9361-2342
Rongjiang WangThe Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Huzhou Normal College, Huzhou Key Laboratory of Precise Diagnosis and Treatment of Urinary Tumors, Huzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Xiaodong LiuLi Ka Shing Institute of Health Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Dinglan WuSH Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China. dlwu@surgery.cuhk.edu.hk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5057-9626
Chi-Fai NgSH Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China. ngcf@surgery.cuhk.edu.hk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1723-9646

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) N_CUHK448/24Research Grants Council, University Grants Committee (RGC, UGC) 14109025Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Commission GJHZ2022091 314420901
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEmerging evidence in cancer neuroscience indicates that the nervous system interacts directly or indirectly with cancer cells, promoting tumor progression. The prostate gland contains an extensive neural network essential for regulating key physiological functions of prostate cells, and the significant neural distribution observed in prostate cancer highlights its critical role in driving cancer pathogenesis. Unfortunately, Comprehensive reviews systematically summarizing progress in cancer neuroscience for prostate cancer are currently lacking.

methodWe synthesize existing research on interactions between the nervous system and prostate cancer cells, explore the neural distribution within the prostate, and evaluate the impact of neural innervation on prostate cancer development and progression. Additionally, we also assess the potential neural regulation mechanisms in neuroendocrine prostate cancer (NEPC).

resultWe found that neural interactions significantly influence prostate cancer development. Neural circuitry within the tumor microenvironment drives progression and contributes to the aggressiveness of lethal subtypes like NEPC. Targeting neuromodulation emerges as a promising therapeutic approach, potentially allowing the repurposing of established medications for treating advanced tumors.

conclusionNeuromodulation offers a promising therapeutic option for advanced prostate cancer, particularly NEPC, which faces limited treatment options. However, further research is necessary to fully understand the neural regulatory mechanisms involved in prostate cancer development and to identify new therapeutic targets and strategies for advanced stages.

Indexed as

ProstateProstatic NeoplasmsAnimalsDisease ProgressionHumansMaleTumor Microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID41109924
PMCPMC13472861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.