ReviewGenes and immunity2025
Computational neoantigen prediction for cancer immunotherapy.
Review in Genes and immunity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cancer epitope prediction tools and analysis pipelines in CEDAR.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Advances in delivery technologies-powered cancer vaccines.Bioactive materials · 2026Review
- The evolving global landscape of first-in-class oncology drug innovation.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026Review
- Therapeutic Cancer Vaccines in Gastrointestinal Malignancies: Advances, Challenges, and Emerging Strategies.Cancers · 2026Review
- From Neoantigens to Nanocarriers: Modern Methods and Modalities in Using Peptides for Cancer Vaccination.Biochemistry · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cancer represents a significant global health concern, profoundly affecting morbidity and mortality rates worldwide. Due to cancer-associated genetic changes, cancer cells harbor neoantigens (Tumor-Specific Antigens). They are attractive targets for personalized and generalized cancer therapeutics, including cancer vaccines, T cell adoptive therapy, and immunomonitoring. Such antigens can arise at genomic, transcriptomic, and proteomic levels. The host immune system recognizes neoantigens through their presentation on Major Histocompatibility Complexes (MHC), leading to T cell activation and antitumor response, provided sufficient co-stimulatory signals are provided by antigen-presenting cells, including dendritic cells. Computational tools for neoantigen analysis are rapidly advancing, improving prediction accuracy. Bioinformatics tools aid in identifying somatic mutations and selecting neoantigens based on MHC binding and immunogenicity scores. Cost-efficient computational Human Leukocyte Antigen haplotyping uses sequencing data, while proteogenomic strategies, integrating immunopeptidomics, validate neoantigens by detecting peptides naturally presented by tumor cells. Integrating proteome-based validation provides experimental confirmation, strengthening confidence in predictions. Ongoing developments in bioinformatics and multi-omics integration contribute to neoantigen identification, enabling personalized cancer immunotherapies. This review discusses various computational tools/pipelines, their implementation, clinical trials on neoantigenic vaccines, and the limitations/prospects of neoantigen prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41109906What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.