ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2026
Toward developing more effective screening questionnaires for obstructive sleep apnoea: a conceptual model and testing.
Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Toward improved screening models for obstructive sleep apnea: comments on the conceptual framework by Molnár et al.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026Article
- Vitamin D and Mean Platelet Volume as Biomarkers in Pediatric Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Associations with Disease Severity and Sleep Parameters.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose'Paper-and-pencil' questionnaires are essential tools for the preliminary screening of obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA), a condition that is rapidly becoming more common yet often remains underdiagnosed. The most commonly used simple tests were developed several decades ago and require updating. This research aims to gain a better understanding of the various factors that contribute to the development of OSA.
methodsA total of 911 patients participated in the study and completed a self-designed questionnaire that assessed their perceptions of the intensity of various risk factors for OSA, associated comorbid conditions, sleep quality, and lifestyle-related characteristics. Following this, polysomnography was conducted to objectively evaluate the severity of OSA. The relationships among predisposing and contributing factors, as well as the perceived symptoms of OSA, were analysed using partial least squares regression.
resultsOur findings emphasise the crucial roles of sex, body mass index, age, and the presence of gastroesophageal reflux disease in the development of OSA. Therefore, questions about these factors should be included in a future, updated questionnaire. The relationships between sleep quality, quality of life, and OSA is highly complex; both their values and the directions of their regression parameters vary significantly between OSA patients and those without OSA. It is possible to distinguish OSA patients with 91.87% accuracy, achieving high sensitivity (78.2%) and specificity (96.5%), based on the structure of path and regression coefficients.
conclusionsOur findings indicate opportunities for developing more effective and targeted questionnaires that remain relatively simple without being overly simplified. We discovered that a two-step question format could yield the most beneficial outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.