Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41109863›Full record

Observational studyJournal of human hypertension2025

Performance of a cuffless photoplethysmography-based device for continuous monitoring of blood pressure after cardiac surgery: a preliminary validation study.

Elias Hellou, Tamer Jamal, Elchanan Zuroff, Parvin Kalhor, Maria Delgado-Lelievre, Matteo Manzato, Lilach O Lerman, Amir Lerman, Erez Kachel, Ziad Zoghby

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational StudyValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of human hypertension, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04071015 (Comparison of Continuous Non-Invasive Blood Pressure Measurement Using the Wireless Cuffless Biobeat Monitor with an Invasive Arterial Line Catheter), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04071015 recruitingnot on this map

Comparison of Continuous Non-Invasive Blood Pressure Measurement Using the Wireless Cuffless Biobeat Monitor with an Invasive Arterial Line Catheter

TypeobservationalSponsorBiobeat Technologies Ltd.Ran2020 to 2026Enrolled250ConditionsBlood Pressure, Heart DiseasesArmsNon-invasive monitoring
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Elias HellouDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Tamer JamalDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Leviev Heart and Vascular Center, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Elchanan ZuroffDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Leviev Heart and Vascular Center, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Parvin KalhorDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Maria Delgado-LelievreDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Comprehensive Hypertension Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, US.
Matteo ManzatoDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-9080-2183
Lilach O LermanDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3271-3887
Amir LermanDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Erez Kachel *Department of Cardiac Surgery, Leviev Heart and Vascular Center, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Ziad Zoghby *Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. Zoghby.Ziad@mayo.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8734-9699

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate and convenient monitoring of blood pressure (BP) is challenging and relies on cuff-based devices or in the postoperative/intensive care settings, on invasive measurements. The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the accuracy of BP measurements obtained from a novel, commercially available cuffless, non-invasive photoplethysmography (PPG)-based chest patch monitor in patients after cardiac surgery. This single center prospective preliminary validation study enrolled adults who underwent cardiac surgery. Data generated by the PPG-based device was compared to those of a standard invasive arterial pressure (IAP). Bland-Altman plots and Pearson's correlations were used to assess the accuracy of the PPG-based device. Stability and BP changes were not formally evaluated. Ninety-six patients consented for the study. Mean age was 63.2 ± 12.2 years (range 24-84), and 32 (33%) were women. Average monitoring was 25.6 ± 17.2 h. In total, we evaluated 78,659 readings for systolic BP (SBP), 78,818 for diastolic BP (DBP), and 92,544 for heart rate (HR). The correlation coefficients were r = 0.959, 0.973, 0.966, and 0.962 for SBP, DBP, mean arterial pressure (MAP), and (HR), respectively. The bias ± SD was 0.1 ± 4.8 mmHg for SBP; 0.4 ± 2.1 mmHg for DBP; 0.26 ± 2.6 mmHg for MAP, and 0.15 ± 3.6 beats per minutes for HR. 95% of SBP, and 99.9% of DBP measurements were within 10 mmHg of the reference measurement. In conclusion, the tested cuffless device offers acceptable accuracy and is a promising novel noninvasive tool for continuous BP monitoring. Further studies are needed to validate these findings according to the most updated validation protocols for pulseless devices.ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT04071015. Demonstrating (A) patient's flow chart; (B) Photoplethysmography sensor principals of action; (C) Study design, parallel measurement of IAP and cuffless device for patients in ICCU; and (D) the main results of the study.Blood pressure (BP), Systolic blood pressure (SBP), Diastolic blood pressure (DBP), Mean arterial pressure (MAP), and Heart rate (HR).

Indexed as

Blood PressureBlood Pressure DeterminationCardiac Surgical ProceduresPhotoplethysmographyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsYoung Adult

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.