ArticleMelanoma management2025
Patient preferences for stages II-IV melanoma treatments in the UK: results from a cross-sectional study.
Article in Melanoma management, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo understand patient preferences for treatment attributes in adjuvant and metastatic melanoma in the UK. MATERIALS AND
methodsPatients with stages II-IV melanoma completed an online survey from November 2022 to February 2023 comprising two discrete choice experiments (DCE) exploring efficacy, safety, and dosing regimen.
resultsOut of 104 respondents, 100 and 102 patients completed DCEs for adjuvant (Adj-DCE) and metastatic (Met-DCE) settings, respectively. 4-year relapse-free survival (RFS) for Adj-DCE (33%), and 4-year overall survival (OS) for Met-DCE (40%) had the highest relative attribute importance (RI), followed by risk of grade ≥3 adverse events (29% versus 26%, respectively). Patients with advanced melanoma or BRAF mutation had significantly higher RI for RFS and OS.
conclusionPatients, especially those with advanced melanoma or BRAF mutation, perceive efficacy as the most important factor in determining choice of treatment.ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTSIn the UK, melanoma is the 5
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.