ArticleUrology2026
Early Real-World Experience With Optilume Drug-coated Balloon for Anterior Urethral Strictures and Posterior Urethral Stenoses.
Article in Urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Paclitaxel Drug-Coated Balloon (OptilumeMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo determine the early experience with paclitaxel-drug coated balloon (DCB) for both anterior urethral stricture disease (aUSD) and posterior urethral stenoses (PUS).
methodsA retrospective review of patients undergoing Optilume DCB in the Trauma and Urologic Reconstructive Network of Surgeons (TURNS) database was performed. Both functional (improved subjective voiding without a secondary procedure) and anatomic (open lumen on cystoscopy) success rates were determined. Kaplan Meier estimates were used to determine the risk of failure by LSE classification and LSE Stage.
resultsA total of 319 patients were treated with the DCB, of which 260 were for aUSD and 59 were for PUS. Median age was 64 years (Interquartile range [IQR] 48-73). Recurrence was noted in 119 patients (37.3%) at a median follow-up of 5.7 months (IQR 3-12). For aUSD, the 1-year functional recurrence-free survival was 78.4% (95% CI 71.8-85.4) and anatomical recurrence-free survival was 66.4% (95% CI 59.5-74.2). For PUS, the 1-year functional recurrence-free survival was 75.8% (95% CI 61.4-93.7) and anatomical recurrence-free survival was 59.4% (95% CI 44.1-80). Recurrences of any kind were significantly more likely in patients with strictures after hypospadias repair (HR 5.21, 95% CI 1.06-25.6, P = .042), and use of 24 Fr, 3 cm DCB (HR 3.64, 95% 1.10-12.09, P = .035). These were also significant predictors of anatomical recurrences.
conclusionMulti-institutional utilization of the DCB for aUSD and PUS demonstrates a low effectiveness among high-risk strictures. Recurrence after DCB varies based on stricture characteristics and subtype, which are important for preoperative counseling and postoperative surveillance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.