ArticleAmerican journal of obstetrics and gynecology2026
Semi-supervised deep learning for uterus and bladder segmentation on female pelvic floor magnetic resonance imaging with limited labeled data.
Article in American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAccurately outlining ("segmenting") pelvic organs from magnetic resonance imaging scans is crucial for studying pelvic organ prolapse. The labor-intensive process of segmentation that identifies which pixels correspond to a particular organ in magnetic resonance imaging datasets imposes a substantial bottleneck on training artificial intelligence to do automated segmentation techniques, underscoring a need for methods that can operate effectively with minimal prelabeled data.
objectiveThe aim of this study is to introduce a novel semi-supervised learning process that uses limited data annotation in pelvic magnetic resonance imaging to improve automated segmentation. By effectively using both labeled and unlabeled magnetic resonance imaging data, our approach seeks to improve the accuracy and efficiency of pelvic organ segmentation, thereby reducing the reliance on extensive labeled datasets for artificial intelligence model training. STUDY
designThe study used a semi-supervised deep learning framework for uterus and bladder segmentation, in which a model is trained using both a small number of expert-outlined structures and a large number of unlabeled scans, leveraging the information from the labeled data to guide the model and improve its predictions on the unlabeled data. It involved 4103 magnetic resonance images from 48 female subjects. This approach included self-supervised learning of image restoration tasks for feature extraction and pseudo-label generation, followed by combined supervised learning on labeled images and unsupervised training on unlabeled images. The method's performance was evaluated quantitatively using the Dice Similarity Coefficient, Average Surface Distance, and 95% Hausdorff Distance. For statistical analysis, 2-tailed paired t-tests were conducted for comparison.
resultsThis framework demonstrated the capacity to achieve segmentation accuracy comparable to traditional methods while requiring only about 60% of the typically necessary labeled data. Specifically, the semi-supervised approach achieved Dice Similarity Coefficients of 0.84±0.04, Average Surface Distances of 13.98±0.93, and 95% Hausdorff Distances of 2.15±0.40 for the uterus and 0.92±0.05, 2.51±0.83, and 2.88±0.17 for the bladder, respectively (P value <.001 for all), outperforming both the baseline supervised learning and transfer learning models. Additionally, 3-dimensional reconstructions using the semi-supervised method exhibited superior details in the visualized organs.
conclusionThis study's semi-supervised learning framework wherein the full use of unlabeled data markedly reduces the necessity for extensive manual annotations, achieving high segmentation accuracy with substantially fewer labeled images that can enhance clinical evaluation and advance medical image analysis by reducing the dependency on large-scale labeled pelvic magnetic resonance imaging datasets for training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.