ArticleDrug and alcohol dependence2025
Unhealthy alcohol use detection in electronic health records: A comparative study using natural language processing.
Article in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Association between vitamin D deficiency and longitudinal risk of head and neck cancer: a multi-institutional retrospective study.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundUnhealthy alcohol use, including risky alcohol use and alcohol use disorder (AUD), are under-identified in primary care settings. Natural Language Processing (NLP) is a promising approach that could identify unhealthy alcohol use from clinical notes even when structured data (SD) indicators are lacking. This study prospectively evaluated the performance of SD and NLP in identifying unhealthy alcohol use in primary care patients.
methodsWe extracted electronic health record (EHR) data of primary care patients at a large Midwestern Health System (N = 133,144) and applied two identification approaches; an SD approach (i.e., diagnostic codes and alcohol screening scores) and an NLP-based approach. We then recruited N = 170 participants identified by SD (N = 85) or NLP (N = 85) to complete gold-standard self-report measures and compared the number of positive cases identified by each method.
resultsIn the full EHR sample, SD identified 820 cases of unhealthy alcohol use, and NLP identified 48,262 cases with unhealthy alcohol use. Among participants identified by SD, 41.18 % reported AUD, and 28.82 % reported risky alcohol use. Among those identified by NLP, 20 % reported AUD and 27.06 % reported risky alcohol use. Participants identified by SD had more AUD symptoms and mental health difficulties.
conclusionsNLP identified many primary care patients with indicators of unhealthy alcohol use that SD missed, indicating NLP could substantially expand identification of unhealthy alcohol use in primary care populations, particularly those with lower severity alcohol use disorder. NLP could complement traditional screening methods for comprehensive unhealthy alcohol use detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.