Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41108938›Full record

SynthesisPoultry science2025

One size does not fit all: Are there any sustainable alternatives to soybean in chicken systems?

James Chege Wangui, James David Taylor, Harry Barraza, Paul Hancock, Ilias Kyriazakis

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Poultry science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

James Chege WanguiInstitute for Global Food Security, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom. Electronic address: w.chege@qub.ac.uk.
James David TaylorInstitute for Global Food Security, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.
Harry BarrazaLGC Ltd, The Priestley Building, Surrey Research Park, Guildford, GU2 7XY, United Kingdom.
Paul HancockLGC Ltd, The Priestley Building, Surrey Research Park, Guildford, GU2 7XY, United Kingdom.
Ilias KyriazakisInstitute for Global Food Security, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The overreliance on soybeans in broiler diets is unsustainable, driving interest in alternative proteins. However, most studies assess either performance or environmental impacts, limiting holistic assessment. We combined systematic review, meta-analysis and life cycle assessment (LCA) to evaluate circular bioeconomy-derived alternative proteins. The study involved 102 studies from the past 20 years. Alternative proteins were grouped into eight categories: aquatic, dried distillers' grains with solubles (DDGS), seed, leaf, microbial, processed animal proteins (PAPs), rapeseed and mixed proteins. Broiler strains were grouped as Cobb, Ross or "Other". Performance indicators (ADFI, ADG, Feed Conversion Ratio (FCR), digestibility and mortality) were analysed against protein type (PT), inclusion level (L) and strain (S) using mixed-effects and linear models with region as a random factor. For LCA, three top-performing alternatives proteins at two inclusion levels were compared with soybean diets across Ross 308 growth phases. Environmental impacts were quantified within broiler farm system boundary, using a functional unit of 1,000 kg carcass. PAPs use dominated in Europe (44%) and Asia (33%), DDGS in Americas (50%) and seed in Africa (56%). ADFI, ADG, and FCR showed a three-way interaction in starters (PT x L x S, p <0.05), ADG and FCR in growers, and none in finishers, suggesting a declining sensitivity to dietary substitution with age. Ross birds were most sensitive to PT and L (p < 0.05). Ileal DM and CP digestibility decreased (p < 0.05) at higher inclusion for all alternatives. Mortality varied by PT, with seed lower (p < 0.05) than DDGS and microbial proteins. Based on inverse variance-weighted relative FCR, microalgae, PAPs and DDGS were selected for LCA. Microalgae increased all environmental impacts except terrestrial acidification (-15.8%) and marine eutrophication (-22.6%). PAPs reduced all impacts but increased terrestrial acidification (8%). DDGS reduced all impacts per functional unit but increased all impacts in manure except global warming (-4%). No alternative protein fits all contexts and choices must balance broiler performance with environmental sustainability.

Indexed as

Animal FeedAnimal HusbandryChickensDietGlycine maxAnimal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsAlternative proteinBroiler strainCircular bioeconomyLife cycle assessmentSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID41108938
PMCPMC12554963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.