ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2026
Online Spatiotemporally Constrained Reconstruction for Real-Time Interactive MRI.
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- BART Streams: Real-Time Reconstruction Using a Modular Framework for Pipeline Processing.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Dynamic Mode Decomposition (DMD) for Low-Latency Real-Time Cardiac MRI.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Online Spatiotemporally Constrained Reconstruction for Real-Time Interactive MRI.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo develop a low-latency dynamic MRI reconstruction that provides better spatial and temporal fidelity than contemporary online reconstruction, for localization.
methodsWe utilize online spatiotemporally constrained reconstruction (STCR) using a computationally efficient augmented Lagrangian solution and a limited number of iterations that terminate before the acquisition of the next frame. Online STCR is evaluated in the setting of fetal cardiac localization at 0.55 T, and is compared with online view-sharing and offline compressed sensing, using edge sharpness metrics.
resultsOnline STCR has the highest structural similarity index measure (SSIM) to offline STCR among the compared online reconstruction methods. Spatial edge sharpness improved by 13%
conclusionWe demonstrate low-latency reconstruction for 2D real-time MRI at 1.5
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.