SynthesisInternational journal of geriatric psychiatry2025
Prevalence and Associated Factors of Chronic Depression Among Older Adults: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression.
Synthesis in International journal of geriatric psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prevalence and Associated Factors of Chronic Depression Among Older Adults: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression.International journal of geriatric psychiatry · 2025Pooled it
- [Quality of relationships among the oldest old in Germany-an examination of the association with depressive symptoms and loneliness].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2026Article
- Relationship among frailty, nutrition, depression and quality of life in the older population.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- Persistence and Determinants of Late-Life Depression: Results of the Nationally Representative Longitudinal German Aging Survey 2008 to 2023.International journal of geriatric psychiatry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesAlthough late-life depression is common, there has previously not been a comprehensive review of chronic depression (CD) in older adults. This systematic review summarizes prevalence rates, potential risk factors, and consequences of CD in later life.
methodsThis preregistered review (PROSPERO: CRD42025649324) searched MEDLINE, Web of Science, CINAHL and PsycINFO from inception to February 2025. Observational studies reporting the prevalence of CD in older adults (mean age 60+) were included. Study quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institutes Critical Appraisal Tool. Random-effects models were used to estimate pooled prevalence across subgroups and meta-regression analyses were used to explore sources of heterogeneity.
resultsA total of 39 articles (38 studies) met the inclusion criteria; 20 articles (27 data points) were included in meta-analysis for point prevalence. Overall point prevalence was 4.02% [2.88%-5.35%], with estimates varying by assessment method: 2.30% [1.47%-3.31%] using DSM-IV/DSM-III-R, 7.12% [2.31%-14.22%] using DSM-III/ICD-10% and 5.52% [3.80%-7.54%] using rating scales. Prevalence varied also by region and was higher for women. Consistent risk factors included less physical activity and higher impairment in daily life. Evidence on consequences was sparse.
conclusionsApproximately 4% of adults aged 60+ meet criteria for CD. Estimates vary substantially by method and region, and potential risk factors and outcomes remain poorly understood. Future studies should target underrepresented subgroups - such as the oldest old, the institutionalized and physically and cognitively impaired individuals-using both dimensional and categorical assessment. CD in late life appears often unrecognized, untreated and underresearched.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.