ArticlePM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation2026
Considerations of race and ethnicity within rehabilitation studies for post COVID-19 condition: A scoping review.
Article in PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Post COVID-19 condition (PCC) or long COVID disproportionately affects racial and ethnic minority communities. There are a growing number of rehabilitation studies for PCC, however, it has yet to be determined whether existing studies take race and ethnicity into account in their study designs and whether existing rehabilitative approaches are equally effective across diverse racial and ethnic groups. The objective of this study was to describe the extent to which rehabilitation studies of PCC consider race and ethnicity in defining eligibility criteria, planning recruitment strategies, designing intervention delivery and adherence promoting approaches, selecting outcome measures, and reporting results. Of the 4845 studies screened, 23 met eligibility criteria and were included in this review. The most common reason for exclusion was a lack of mention of race or ethnicity anywhere within the article. Among the 23 studies included, 13 studies provided data on the race and/or ethnicity characteristics of their sample, with 88% of participants across all of these studies being White. Less than 25% of studies described the incorporation of race and/or ethnicity in their recruitment strategies (n = 3, 13%) or data analysis (n = 5, 22%). Greater racial and ethnic diversity is needed within rehabilitation studies for PCC as there is currently a significant underrepresentation of racial and ethnic minorities in existing studies. Overall, more PCC rehabilitation studies need to incorporate race and ethnicity into their study designs as it is not well understood whether existing rehabilitation strategies are equally effective across different racial and ethnic groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.