Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41108582›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of animal ecology2025

Temperature influences pollinators' choice of floral partners independently of community composition.

K C Arrowsmith, Madeleine D Strait, Manogya Chandar, Annie Schiffer, Berry J Brosi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of animal ecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

K C ArrowsmithDepartment of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3483-1235
Madeleine D StraitDepartment of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Manogya ChandarDepartment of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Annie SchifferRocky Mountain Biological Laboratory, Crested Butte, Colorado, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2036-5819
Berry J BrosiDepartment of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.

Funding

DEVCOM Army Research Laboratory W911NF1910231Division of Biological Infrastructure DBI-2305867Division of Environmental Biology DEB-1834487Division of Environmental Biology DEB-2129759National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program DGE-2140004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Climate change can impact species interactions by changing the spatial and/or temporal overlap of interaction partners, but interspecific interactions can also vary when partners remain co-located in space and time. Understanding the effects of climate-driven environmental variation, such as rising temperatures, is particularly important for interactions that underlie key ecosystem functions like pollination. However, very little is known about how temperature variation may impact plant-pollinator interaction patterns in the absence of shifts in species presence or abundance, in part because environmental variation across multiple days or sites is often confounded with changing community composition. In this study, we examined the effects of temperature variation on pollinators' choice of floral partners within near-static ecological communities by sampling interactions at multiple temperatures within individual days-a method that allowed us to disentangle the effects of temperature variation and species turnover on patterns of plant-pollinator interactions. The substantial temperature variation both within and across days in each growing season also enabled us to largely disentangle temperature variation from time-of-day effects. With this sampling protocol, we show that temperature can influence pollinator floral choice independently of changes in species composition. We found differences in the choice of floral resources across pollinator taxa as temperature varied during individual days and further found that bumble bees, but not sweat bees, exhibited this pattern when analyzed independently. We also confirmed that our observed trends were not driven by variation in the number of interactions recorded, the relative abundance of pollinators, or in the overall attractiveness of flowers at different temperatures. We propose that thermal niche partitioning in this system could be driven by physiological and behavioral factors including energetics and competition for specific floral resources at different temperatures. These insights into thermal variation in pollinators' floral choice contribute to wider understanding of the fine-scale mechanisms through which climate change may impact ecological networks, community resilience, and ecosystem functioning.

Indexed as

FlowersPollinationTemperatureAnimalsBeesClimate Changedietary preferenceenergeticsfloral choiceplant–pollinator interactionspollination ecologytemperaturethermal niche

Identifiers

PMID41108582
PMCPMC12673243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.