ArticleOdontology2026
Influence of preheating resin composites: a nano-CT assessment on voids and internal adaptation.
Article in Odontology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gap percentage at the restoration-tooth interface and internal voids remain significant limitations in resin-based composite restorations, contributing to marginal leakage, secondary caries, and restoration failure. Preheating composite resins has been proposed as a strategy to enhance adaptation and reduce polymerization-induced stress. To evaluate the influence of preheating resin composites and varying light-curing durations on gap percentage at the restoration-tooth interface, internal adaptation, and void formation in Class II restorations using high-resolution Nano-CT imaging. Fifteen human maxillary premolars were prepared with standardized Class II cavities and allocated into three groups (n = 5). Group 1 received room-temperature composite cured for 20 s. Groups 2 and 3 received composite preheated to 68 °C using the Compex HD warmer, cured for 20 and 5 s, respectively. All restorations were bulk-filled. Internal adaptation (gap percentage) and voids were assessed using a Bruker Skyscan 2214 Nano-CT, followed by quantitative analysis with ImageJ and CTAnalyser software. Statistical comparisons were performed using one-way ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc test. Preheated composites (Groups 2 and 3) demonstrated significantly reduced gap percentages compared to room-temperature controls (p < 0.0001). Group 3 exhibited the lowest gap percentages and void volume, even with a 5 s curing protocol. No significant differences were observed in void frequency between groups. Preheating resin composites enhances internal adaptation and reduces interfacial gap percentage and void volume, even with reduced curing time. This technique offers a promising, efficient approach for improving posterior composite restoration outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41108482What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.