ArticleGeneral thoracic and cardiovascular surgery2026
Left atrial appendage blood flow analysis using four-dimensional flow magnetic resonance imaging.
Article in General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThrombus formation in atrial fibrillation is caused by blood flow stagnation within the left atrial appendage (LAA). It is believed that blood flow tends to stagnate within the LAA even in patients with sinus rhythm and high risk of stroke. This study evaluated blood flow within the LAA using four-dimensional flow magnetic resonance imaging among patients stratified by the congestive heart failure, hypertension, age, diabetes mellitus, prior stroke, vascular disease, age, sex category (CHA
methodsNinety-eight participants with sinus rhythm (70 patients, 28 controls) underwent non-contrast four-dimensional flow magnetic resonance imaging. Participants were divided into low- and high-risk groups (CHA
resultsThe blood flow volume was significantly reduced in the top segment of the LAA in the high-risk group (low-risk: 3.13 ± 1.07 mL/cm
conclusionsIn patients with high CHA
Indexed as
Identifiers
41108474What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.