ArticleJournal of religion and health2026
Identification of Hotspots and Bibliometric Trends within Spirituality Research Related to Women's Health (2000-2024).
Article in Journal of religion and health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluation of the Relationship Between the Spirituality and Spiritual Care Perception of Elderly Care Students and Their Hopelessness Levels: A Turkish Example.Journal of religion and health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bibliometric analysis is an innovative combination of different methods to conduct quantitative analysis of scientific output. This study aimed to analyze the bibliometric patterns of spirituality research in women's health. This is a descriptive bibliometric study. Data were obtained from Web of Science Core Collection database. Data analysis was conducted with Web of Science Core Collection, VOSviewer, and Bibliometrix package in R software. A total of 2169 articles were analyzed. A total of 1418 authors and 576 institutions from 48 countries have contributed spirituality research in women's health. The most productive author was Wilfred McSherry with 17 articles. The USA with 177 articles and Universidade De Sao Paulo 35 articles were the most productive country and institution, respectively. The top 10 keywords on this research area were health, care, religion, quality of life, needs, cancer, stress, life, mental health, and experiences. The study will help to finding potential collaborators, countries, and institutions for future researchers. In addition, it will guide researchers, practitioners, and scholars in further studies, health policy development, and evidence-based clinical practice on spirituality in women's health. This study not only enriches global readers in the field of spirituality research in women's health but may also be beneficial in providing input to guide future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41108455What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.