Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41108448›Full record

ArticleAnatomical science international2026

Age-dependent development of the interincisive suture: a CT-based study on prevalence and dimensions.

Julian J Graef, Moritz Staeber, Michael J Schmeisser, Sven Schumann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Anatomical science international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Julian J GraefInstitute of Anatomy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Moritz StaeberInstitute of Anatomy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Michael J SchmeisserInstitute of Anatomy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Sven SchumannInstitute of Anatomy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany. sven.schumann@mhb-fontane.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1785-622X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The interincisive suture (sutura interincisiva) connects the left and right premaxilla at the midline of the anterior palate and plays a role in craniofacial development. Despite its anatomical and developmental importance, postnatal changes in this suture remain understudied. Here, we investigated the age-dependent growth and closure of the interincisive suture using CT scans from 384 patients aged 0-94 years. Suture presence, length, and width were assessed in five-year age groups. Results show a progressive closure of the suture with age, with complete obliteration in most individuals over 35. Rates of open interincisive sutures in older patients are up to 25%. Sex differences emerged, with females showing a higher rate of suture closure in early years but a higher rate of open sutures in old age. A strong negative correlation was observed between age and both suture width (r = -0.545, p < 0.001) and length (r = -0.530, p < 0.001). The findings highlight similarities with, but also distinctions from, other midfacial sutures such as the midpalate suture and the incisive suture. Clinical implications include timing considerations for orthodontic interventions and improved understanding of midfacial growth patterns.

Indexed as

Cranial SuturesPalate, HardAdolescentAged, 80 and overAge FactorsChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleTomography, X-Ray ComputedCraniofacial developmentHard palateOrthodonticsPremaxillaSutura interincisiva

Identifiers

PMID41108448
PMCPMC13541829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.