SynthesisNeurosurgical review2025
Repeated radiosurgery for recurrent or refractory trigeminal neuralgia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Repeat gamma knife radiosurgery for recurrent trigeminal neuralgia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Acta neurochirurgica · 2026Pooled it
- Treatment of Typical and Atypical Trigeminal Neuralgia with LINAC-Based Radiosurgery: Complications, Recurrence Rates and Long-Term Treatment Outcomes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Initial Experience With Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Refractory Trigeminal Neuralgia Using the OXRAY System.Cureus · 2026Article
- Neurovascular Compression Syndromes of Cranial Nerves: A Multidisciplinary Guide to Management.Brain sciences · 2026Review
- V1-dominant Recurrence of Trigeminal Neuralgia after Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for V2-V3 Pain in a Patient with Persistent Vertebral Artery Compression: A Case Report.NMC case report journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) is a well-established component of the multimodal approach to treating trigeminal neuralgia (TN), a condition marked by frequent and recurrent episodes despite treatments. As a result, an increasing number of centers are offering patients a second or even third round of SRS. Despite this trend, there remains ongoing debate regarding optimal radiation dosing, target planning, overall treatment efficacy, duration of symptom relief, and the safety of repeated procedures. In this study, we present a systematic review and meta-analysis of the existing literature on repeated stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with refractory and recurrent TN. According to PRISMA guidelines, we extracted data regarding general patients features, pre-radiosurgical treatments, irradiation doses of Radiosurgical cycles, target planning, outcome and complications. Out of 461 patients included, 317 (73%) achieved a Barrow Neurological Institute pain scale (BNI) ≤ III after a second SRS procedure. The mean irradiation dose employed in the second treatment was 68.4 Gy with a cumulative dose of 145.9 Gy. Out of the 317 patients with favourable outcome, 101 (31.9%) relapsed after a mean 19.2 months. Patients who responded to a first SRS course were 6 times more likely to achieve pain control after repeateded SRS. Complications were mild and were mainly represented by V cranial nerve dysfunction in 202 patients (43.8%). No cases of radionecrosis, hydrocephalus, or brainstem damage were reported. With a mean follow-up of 19.2 months, repeat SRS was effective in controlling pain in roughly 47% of patients. Dosimetric analysis showed high variability of irradiation doses and target planning. Although data support the safety of repeated SRS in patients with refractory or recurrent TN, homogeneous treatment protocols and uniformity in data reporting is needed to optimize the potential of repeated SRS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.