Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41108435›Full record

ArticlePsychological research2025

The (meta-)memory superiority effect of induced insight on item memory and associative memory: the role of association appropriateness.

Zhonglu Zhang, Yue Zhou, Yuxin Zeng, Qiang Xing

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zhonglu ZhangDepartment of Psychology, School of Education, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, 510006, China. zzllzz_2005@126.com.
Yue ZhouDepartment of Psychology, School of Education, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, 510006, China.
Yuxin ZengDepartment of Psychology, School of Education, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, 510006, China.
Qiang XingDepartment of Psychology, School of Education, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, 510006, China. qiang_xingpsy@126.com.

Funding

MOE (Ministry of Education in China) Youth Project of Humanities and Social Sciences 21YJC190025the National Natural Science Foundation of China 32271118
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous research has consistently revealed that learning via induced insight yields a better memory of solutions than non-insightful conditions. However, it is yet to be determined whether associative appropriateness, a critical component of creative insight, plays a role in this superiority effect of induced insight on both item memory (solutions and problems) and associative memory, in both enhancing remembering and slowing forgetting at the object level, as well as in enhancing metamemory monitoring. Across three experiments, participants either had sudden comprehension (forming appropriate associations) or incomprehension (forming inappropriate associations) of riddles and received immediate and delayed recognition tests. The results indicated that the appropriate (vs. inappropriate) condition yielded higher recognition rates, shorter recognition times, and smaller decreases in recognition rates, as well as higher retrospective confidence ratings, together with decreased metamemory bias and increased metamemory accuracy, on solutions, problems, and their associations. These findings demonstrate the role of associative appropriateness in the (meta-)memory superiority effect of induced insight on item memory and associative memory from multiple perspectives.

Indexed as

AssociationAssociation LearningMemoryMetacognitionRecognition, PsychologyAdultFemaleHumansMaleMental RecallYoung Adult

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.