ArticlePsychological research2025
The (meta-)memory superiority effect of induced insight on item memory and associative memory: the role of association appropriateness.
Article in Psychological research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Memory Superiority Effect of Induced Insight in Semantic Versus Perceptual Levels.Journal of Intelligence · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Previous research has consistently revealed that learning via induced insight yields a better memory of solutions than non-insightful conditions. However, it is yet to be determined whether associative appropriateness, a critical component of creative insight, plays a role in this superiority effect of induced insight on both item memory (solutions and problems) and associative memory, in both enhancing remembering and slowing forgetting at the object level, as well as in enhancing metamemory monitoring. Across three experiments, participants either had sudden comprehension (forming appropriate associations) or incomprehension (forming inappropriate associations) of riddles and received immediate and delayed recognition tests. The results indicated that the appropriate (vs. inappropriate) condition yielded higher recognition rates, shorter recognition times, and smaller decreases in recognition rates, as well as higher retrospective confidence ratings, together with decreased metamemory bias and increased metamemory accuracy, on solutions, problems, and their associations. These findings demonstrate the role of associative appropriateness in the (meta-)memory superiority effect of induced insight on item memory and associative memory from multiple perspectives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41108435What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.