Trial reportInternational journal of colorectal disease2025
Management of symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease (SUDD) of the colon with Clostridium butyricum CBM588 versus rifaximin: a retrospective cross-sectional study.
Trial report in International journal of colorectal disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSymptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease (SUDD) is a chronic condition frequently characterized by abdominal pain, bloating, and altered bowel habits. While cyclic rifaximin is commonly used for symptom control, interest is growing in the potential role of probiotics. This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of patients with SUDD treated with either Clostridium butyricum CBM588® or cyclic rifaximin over a 12-month period.
methodsThis retrospective cross-sectional study included 70 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of SUDD, treated between 2023 and 2024. Patients were divided into two groups based on treatment received: Group A (CBM588® daily for 12 months) and Group B (cyclic rifaximin 400 mg bid for 7 days per month). Clinical data, symptom profiles, and occurrence of diverticulitis were collected and compared. The primary outcome was the reduction of SUDD-related symptoms, and the secondary outcome was the incidence of acute diverticulitis episodes during follow-up.
resultsA total of 56 patients completed the 12-month follow-up (31 in Group A, 25 in Group B). No significant difference was observed in the rate of symptomatic flares between groups (19.4% vs. 20%, p = 0.7). However, a significantly higher proportion of patients in the CBM588
conclusionIn this retrospective comparison, Clostridium butyricum CBM588
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.