Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41108335›Full record

ArticleDigestive diseases and sciences2026

Comparative Risk of Recurrent Esophageal Variceal Hemorrhage and Other Decompensation Events with Carvedilol Versus Propranolol in Patients with Cirrhosis: A Retrospective Study.

Abdellatif Ismail, Mohammed Abusuliman, Mohammad Kloub, Shahem Abbarh, Khalid Aloum, Mostafa Suhail Najim, Mohammed Al-Aquily, Mahmoud Y Madi, Kamran Qureshi, Wing-Kin Syn

Abstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Preventing First and Further Decompensation in Advanced Chronic Liver Disease.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Abdellatif IsmailDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic-Florida, 2950 Cleveland Clinic Blvd., Weston, FL, 33311, USA. IsmailA4@ccf.org.
Mohammed AbusulimanDepartment of Internal Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA.
Mohammad KloubDepartment of Internal Medicine, New York Medical College - Saint Michael's Medical Center, Newark, NJ, USA.
Shahem AbbarhDepartment of Internal Medicine, MedStar Health, Baltimore, USA.
Khalid AloumDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Colorado University, Denver, CO, USA.
Mostafa Suhail NajimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Rochester Regional Health - Unity Hospital, Rochester, NY, USA.
Mohammed Al-AquilyDepartment of Internal Medicine, Norwalk Hospital/Yale University Program, Norwalk, CT, USA.
Mahmoud Y MadiDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Texas at Austin Dell Medical School, Austin, USA.
Kamran QureshiDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Wing-Kin SynDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND &

aimsNon-selective beta-blockers (NSBBs) have become a cornerstone treatment to prevent complications of cirrhosis and portal hypertension. Data supporting the use of a specific beta-blocker are scarce. In this retrospective study, we aimed to compare the effectiveness of carvedilol versus propranolol in: 1) preventing recurrent esophageal hemorrhage (EVH) in patients with prior history of EVH 2) reducing the occurrence of further decompensation episodes in these patients including hepatic encephalopathy (HE), ascites, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP), hepatorenal syndrome (HRS), and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and 3) reducing all-cause mortality. APPROACH &

resultsThis was a retrospective propensity-matched study using the multi-institutional database TriNetX. We included patients with cirrhosis who had an episode of EVH and were prescribed carvedilol or propranolol between December 2004 and December 2024. The primary outcome was the rate of hospitalization with recurrent EVH within the first 5 years of starting the index NSBB. The secondary outcomes were hospitalization with the principal diagnoses of ascites, SBP, HE, HRS, new diagnosis of HCC, undergoing liver transplant (LT), and all-cause mortality within the observation period of 5 years of NSBB prescription. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was also performed. Compared to propranolol use, carvedilol use was associated with lower risk of EVH (RR, 0.898, P < 0.001), ascites (RR, 0.757, P < 0.001), SBP (RR, 0.680, P < 0.001), HRS (RR, 0.734, P < 0.001), HCC (RR, 0.701, P < 0.001), undergoing LT (RR, 0.825, P = 0.028) and mortality (RR, 0.640, P < 0.001). No difference in HE rates (RR, 0.899, P = 0.071) was found between the two groups.

conclusionsCompared to propranolol, the use of carvedilol in patients with history of cirrhosis and EVH was associated with lower risk of recurrent EVH, further decompensation episodes, undergoing LT, and mortality.

Indexed as

Adrenergic beta-AntagonistsCarvedilolEsophageal and Gastric VaricesGastrointestinal HemorrhageLiver CirrhosisPropranololAgedFemaleHepatic EncephalopathyHumansMaleMiddle AgedRecurrenceRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsCarvedilolPropranololAscitesBeta-blockersDecompensated cirrhosisGastrointestinal bleedingHepatic encephalopathyPortal hypertension

Identifiers

PMID41108335
PMCPMC13144202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.