SynthesisNeurosurgical review2025
Long-term outcome trajectories and health-related quality of life after endovascular thrombectomy for large vessel occlusion stroke: A meta-analysis of randomized trials.
Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have demonstrated the efficacy of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in improving 3-month functional outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion. However, long-term outcome trajectories and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) beyond this 3-month period remain less clearly defined. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs reporting outcomes beyond 90 days after EVT. Functional outcomes were assessed using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) with favorable outcomes defined as mRS 0-2 for small-to-medium core trials and mRS 0-3 for large core or basilar artery occlusion trials. Mortality and HRQoL outcomes were also evaluated. Risk ratios (RRs) and standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects model. Eight RCTs including 3,014 patients (1,670 received EVT) with follow-up to 24 months were analyzed. EVT was associated with a favorable shift in mRS distribution (RR = 1.71, 95% CI 1.49-1.96) and higher rates of favorable outcomes (RR = 1.68, 95% CI 1.32-2.14). Patients with large core infarcts and basilar occlusion showed greater treatment gain with EVT beyond three months. EVT reduced long-term mortality (RR = 0.80, 95% CI 0.72-0.88), while rates of moderate-to-severe disability (mRS 3-5) were similar between groups. HRQoL (measured by the EQ-5D index) was significantly improved in the EVT group (SMD = 0.34, 95% CI 0.13-0.55). Our findings indicate that EVT provides sustained benefits beyond 3 months in functional outcomes, survival, and HRQoL. Recovery patterns in patients with large core infarcts or basilar occlusion seem to be more pronounced over longer periods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41108333What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.